<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/more_on_obama_v_farrakhan.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com,2009://8/tag:ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com,2008://31.41760-</id>
	<updated></updated>
	<title>Comments for More on Obama v. Farrakhan</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com,2008://31.41760</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/more_on_obama_v_farrakhan.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8/entry_id=5432" title="More on Obama v. Farrakhan" />
		<published>2008-02-27T13:45:02Z</published>
		<updated>2008-08-04T16:51:36Z</updated>
		<title>More on Obama v. Farrakhan</title>
		<summary>From Josh Marshall: As a Jew and perhaps more importantly simply as a sentient being I found it disgusting. It was a nationwide, televised, MSM version of one of those noxious Obama smear emails. Kevin Drum weighs in:Just kidding. Seriously,...</summary>
		<author>
			<name></name>
			
		</author>
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/180286.php">Josh Marshall</a>: </p><blockquote><p>As a Jew and perhaps more importantly simply as a sentient being I
found it disgusting. It was a nationwide, televised, MSM version of one
of those noxious Obama smear emails.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_02/013210.php">Kevin Drum</a> weighs in:</p><blockquote><p>Just kidding. Seriously, though, can someone please put a sock in Tim
Russert? I didn't even see the entire exchange, but his badgering of
Obama on the Louis Farrakhan issue was pretty wretched. It was <em>maybe</em>
legitimate to bring it up in the first place, but to keep at it well
after Obama had made his position crystal clear was beyond the pale.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/02/live-blogging-c.html">Andrew Sullivan</a> dissents:</p><blockquote><p>Does Obama understand that saying he has consistently denounced him is
not the same as simply saying, &quot;I denounce him&quot;? A weak response -
reminiscent of Dukakis. (By the way, why is it somehow only a question
for <em>Jewish</em> Americans that Farrakhan is a fascist hate-monger? It's a question for <em>all</em>
Americans.) Obama's Farrakhan response suggests to me he is reluctant
to attack a black demagogue. Maybe he wants to avoid a racial melee.
But he has one. He needs to get real on this. Weak, weak, weak.</p></blockquote>

<p>And then hears about it from his <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/02/dissent-of-th-7.html">readers</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Obama both rejected and denounced Farrakhan.&nbsp; If you'd like, I guess
they could have offered Farrkhan's head on a platter to him during the
debate for a ritualistic slaying.&nbsp; But other Jewish friends I know have
been calling telling me they absolutely loved his response--and these
are those who doubted him on the subject.</p></blockquote>]]>
			
		</content>
	</entry>

</feed>