<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/why_the_new_republic_is_down_with_us.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com,2009://8/tag:ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com,2008://31.41768-</id>
	<updated></updated>
	<title>Comments for Why The New Republic Is Down With Us</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com,2008://31.41768</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/why_the_new_republic_is_down_with_us.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8/entry_id=5440" title="Why The New Republic Is Down With Us" />
		<published>2008-02-25T16:09:57Z</published>
		<updated>2008-08-04T16:51:36Z</updated>
		<title>Why The New Republic Is Down With Us</title>
		<summary>Reverse that I guess, since I&apos;ve never had the pleasure of working with those guys. TNR takes a lot of heat, and perhaps deservedly so, for its Mideast politics. But every once in a while you see something like this,...</summary>
		<author>
			<name></name>
			
		</author>
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[<p>Reverse that I guess, since I've never had the pleasure of working with those guys. TNR takes a lot of heat, and perhaps deservedly so, for its Mideast politics. But every once in a while you see something like <a href="http://tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=0b921198-61b4-40ad-9d01-134ee4c0437b">this</a>, something you know simply would not be published virtually anywhere else that matters. Here's TNR's frank assessment of Bush's over-lauded Africa policy: </p><blockquote><p>Consumed by the war on terror, Bush has taken a far different approach.
Rather than supporting democratic institutions and criticizing a new
generation of African authoritarians, the Bush administration has
backed whatever African leader claims to be battling militant Islam.
For example, the White House has developed a close relationship with
Ethiopia's thuggish leader Meles Zenawi, supposedly an ally in the war
on terror and a partner in battling militancy in neighboring Somalia.
The administration has provided military aid to Ethiopia with virtually
no conditions on the assistance. It has also offered advisers to
support Ethiopia's invasion of neighboring Somalia, an invasion which
only led to more chaos in that benighted nation. Meanwhile, in recent
years Zenawi's government has overseen a massive crackdown on
opposition activists and a brutal offensive in the country's Ogaden
region; in 2005, after disputed elections, the Ethiopian government
arrested over 30,000 of its own people.</p></blockquote>]]>
			
		</content>
	</entry>

</feed>