Comments for More thought on the value of crazy

More thought on the value of crazy

2008-11-10T11:54:13Z

I got this e-mail from a cat who'd read my piece in the Washington Post on Sunday. The note comes from a totally different cultural and historical perspective. It's worth publishing in its entirety. More after the jump:

I'd like to pass along some thoughts about the, "shocking, almost
certifiable faith in humanity, something that subsequent generations lost,"
and the people who live next door.

A native New Yorker, I'm coming up on my 52nd birthday. I was born and
raised in the Washington Heights neighborhood in upper Manhattan. For as
long as I live, I will remember what I saw when I was a boy: the people who
lived in my neighborhood, people much younger then than I am now who looked
older then than I'll look in thirty years' time, if indeed I am blessed
enough to live that long, people with numbers tattooed into their arms,
tattoos put there by the Waffen-SS in the Nazi concentration camps. The
couple who lived next door to my family was luckier; they were the only
members of either of their families to escape Germany before the war,
everyone else -- all of them -- died in the camps. The Nazis tried to
exterminate the Jews because they claimed they were somehow different and
therefore deserving of unremitting hatred, something less than human and
therefore unworthy of life. That's what horror truly is.

]]> America has its own history of treating groups of people as different, as
something less than human and therefore unworthy of the blessings of liberty
the Founders sought to secure, "to ourselves and our posterity," and yes, to
our horror, all too often unworthy of life itself.

It doesn't take very much encouragement to turn fear or ignorance into
hatred. That's what Hitler did. It's what the KKK did, too.

Fear and ignorance only flourish where there is indifference. It is
indifference, as much as fear and ignorance, that we must continue to fight.
I saw the tragedy indifference wrought in the lives of my neighbors and
those of the unnamed men and women of Washington Heights who have gone or
will go to their graves marked by those tattoos. It is indifference, at
least as much as fear, that Franklin Roosevelt warned us against in his
Inaugural Address in 1933. It's what Holocaust survivors warn us against
when they say, "Never Again." Victory in that struggle is what Dr. King
envisioned in his dream, that, "one day this nation will rise up and live
out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident:
that all men are created equal.'"

During my lifetime we have paid a high price as a society in order to
overcome our indifference. I remember hearing of the assassination of John
Kennedy in the same classroom where only weeks earlier I'd watched Dr. King
speak of his dream. I remember the race riots in Watts and Detroit and
Newark and so many other cities. I remember the fight I had with my father
over Dr. King's legacy on the night he was assassinated. I remember walking
with countless others through St. Patrick's Cathedral to see Robert
Kennedy's casket lying before the main altar. I have lived through an age of
indifference that has gripped this country in the forty years since then,
but I still remember the promise of my childhood: a time when citizens were
challenged to ask what they could do for their country and where we were
urged to dream that freedom would ring.

I saw that promise reborn when Barack Obama addressed the Democratic
Convention in 2004. I was so taken by his vision for America that I told a
friend in France to keep an eye on Barack. I was doing then what Rev. Lowery
did in his sermon that you've been obsessed by; we recognized -- perhaps we
knew -- and told other people that, "[s]omething crazy may happen in this
country."

When my French friend and I spoke last Tuesday morning, he described how
wonderful it was going to be to wake up on Wednesday to the news of
President-elect Obama. I'm pretty sure that qualifies as the good crazy.

Heather Havrilesky, writing in

Salon<http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/11/07/havrilesky/index.html>,

makes an interesting observation in her apology to the baby boomers for
complaining about our idealism. She writes, "But on Tuesday night, that
changed. We understood, for the first time in our lives, what it means to be
a part of something big, without reservation. We saw the joy in that.... We
were all Americans, together, old and young, black and white and Latino and
Asian, and it didn't feel hokey or overly earnest to admit it for once."
There's the good crazy again.

What you and Heather and more than half of the population share is youth. I
don't know that you've really lost that shocking faith in humanity -- the
good crazy -- because I'm not sure you've really had the chance to
experience that much of it in the first place, at least when it comes to
politics in this country; you've mostly read about it in history books or
heard about it when older folks prattled on about life back in the day.
Indeed, when Michelle Obama made what amounted to that same observation, the
wingnuts went crazy. But you certainly recognized it when it arrived on the
scene, and you weren't the only ones. Allow me to suggest that you didn't
overestimate the racism -- it was obvious from the many stories of people
admitting to canvassers and reporters, "I'm gonna vote for the n*****," that
racism isn't dead -- but I'm not sure that people really need to be all that
complicated to recognize that things in this country are very badly broken.
What they certainly weren't anymore was indifferent, and as a result,
whether they realized it or not, they'd been looking for the good crazy.

The reason we now share Heather's joy and understand the answer to your
question about what faith in humanity is capable of doing is because, when
we saw a leader with the strength and the courage to remind us of what de
Tocqueville wrote: that, "The greatness of America lies not in being more
enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her
faults," we recognized the good crazy and we acted upon it.

Over the course of the campaign, as I've tried to talk down friends and
family who were afraid that the racists and the wingnuts and the
Swift-boaters would destroy the Obama candidacy, I've often told the story
of Benjamin Franklin's answer to the question he was asked at the conclusion
of the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

*"Well Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?"*

*"A republic, if you can keep it."*

Franklin and de Tocqueville teach us that America's ability to repair her
faults has always rested with We the People. That's what Barack means when
he speaks of our continuing work to perfect the Union.

Our work.

That's what it's always been. It's what the grassroots campaign has been
doing since early last year. It's what we did last Tuesday when we elected
Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United States. It's what President
Obama will ask of us in the years ahead.

And there isn't anything hokey about that at all.
###

There's one more thing I'd like to ask you to think about as you write about
the Obama administration. I was at the fund raiser here in Seattle a couple
of weeks ago where Joe Biden talked about how Barack is going to be tested.
The media reaction to that comment was asinine; all presidents are tested,
that's what the job is all about (Richard Reeves wrote an excellent

piece<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/who_is_prepared_to_be_presiden.html>on

that subject last summer).

What didn't get reported so widely was something else Biden asked those of
us in the room to remember. Sooner or later, President Obama is going to
make a policy decision that we are going to disagree with, but we are going
to have to continue to support him. That's a different thing than what
Barack means when he speaks of himself as imperfect. This is a lot like a
marriage. Like all couples, my wife and I -- and admit it, you and your
partner ;-) -- do things that make one of the other of us angry, but those
things happen because we are human -- imperfection personified -- not
because we don't still love one another.

Upon reflection, all this should be pretty obvious, but government is
different in one important respect. Biden reminded us that Obama isn't going
to make his decisions without consulting his advisers and carefully weighing
the issues, but we've chosen him to actually make the decision. That's how a
republican form of government works. I bring this up because it is of a
piece with what Barack did in his speech on race in Philadelphia. The new
administration is going to treat us as adults, which hasn't happened in a
very long time, and in return we will be expected to actually be adults.
That is simply amazing!

Comment from KevDog on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T12:36:49Z

What an excellent way to start the day.

Comment from Ragamuffin on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T15:04:27Z

Is crazy really the right word?

Comment from Tony Comstock on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T15:30:50Z

The word is "hope", a more nuanced word that many people realize.

Comment from kelly on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T15:44:18Z

Amen to that. Crazy ain't the word. How about hope, strange, wonderful....overdue.

Comment from Incertus on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T15:58:56Z

I don't know that you've really lost that shocking faith in humanity -- the good crazy -- because I'm not sure you've really had the chance to experience that much of it in the first place, at least when it comes to politics in this country; you've mostly read about it in history books or heard about it when older folks prattled on about life back in the day.

I think this really nails it. I just turned 40, and my adult political life has pretty much consisted of Reagan (coming of age), Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush the Lesser as President, with some pretty tightly contested Congresses thrown in there for good measure. It also coincided with the rise of talk radio led by Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, and the myth of the liberal media. So to say that the good crazy has been in short supply is to be kind about it.

And the worldwide examples of the good crazy have often been undercut by the trauma that followed them--the Soviet Union's collapse and the breaking down of the Berlin Wall was tempered by the revival of a democratic-in-name-only government based on corporate rule. The ending of apartheid in South Africa was undercut by the onerous economic demands made on the new country by their former rulers and the people they owed money to. And so on.

So yeah, we were starved for some good crazy, even when we didn't know what it was, and we have a taste for it now. We just need to make sure we keep coming back for more.

Comment from ADLEED on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T17:32:00Z

Participating in civic life does happen! Just don't tell the current crop of departing political types; they do not understand the common good.

Comment from Sporcupine on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T17:37:58Z

So, I'm reading TNC's blog about a YouTube clip, using FireFox on my MacBook, with the desktop showing a cartoon drawing my daughter did in college and posted to DeviantArt so her friends could enjoy it.

Surely the people inventing and naming all this techno-magic have a version of the good crazy going, and surely they're contributing to the global contagion.

Comment from Asher on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T17:46:38Z

Great sentiments, but I've gotta disagree with the guy on Biden. Look at what he actually said.

"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. [Implicit comparison to the Cuban Missle Crisis. Promise this crisis will come sooner than Kennedy's did.] The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy." [They're going to test him because he's young.]

...we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right. [It'll look initially like they don't know what they're doing.]

he's gonna need your help. Because I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' [Obama will be an unpopular President at first.] We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us."

"There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, 'Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don't know about that decision'," Biden continued. "Because if you think the decision is sound when they're made, which I believe you will when they're made, they're not likely to be as popular as they are sound. Because if they're popular, they're probably not sound." [If everybody thinks what they'll be doing is stupid, it'll probably be smart.]

Comment from Incertus on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T18:24:42Z

I don't know, Asher. Assuming the bracketed parts are your interpretations of Biden's words, I don't agree with your assessment of what he said. For example, I don't get "they're going to test him because he's young," from Biden's remarks. I get "they're going to test him because he's new," which isn't the same thing. And your last interpretation I took as "people aren't going to understand the long term implications of these decisions and will question them," which is normal, I think.

Comment from The Cat on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T18:50:51Z

Yes, hope is the right word, but it was Rev. Lowery who originally spoke of the "good crazy." I thought it was an apt synonym for the kind of audacious hope that Barack, the self-described improbable candidate, has been talking about these past few years. After all, if somebody had told you back in 2002 that we would elect, "a skinny black guy with big ears and a funny name," as president, wouldn't the word crazy have crossed your mind?

Comment from Asher on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T18:53:04Z

Then incertus, why the reference to his age and comparison to JFK, another young President? Certainly all new Presidents haven't been tested by international crises in their first few months of office.

Comment from Incertus on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T19:14:43Z

The JFK reference isn't exactly a new one, Asher. People have been comparing Obama to JFK practically since he started talking about running for the Presidency--young, yes, but also a Senator from a blue state, a dynamic speaker who talks about lofty ideals and the need to look beyond one's personal goals for the common good, and an inspirational figure to a new generation of young voters. And remember, 47 is only young in the very limited universe of Presidents--it's middle age for everyone else.

If it were only youth, Biden could have compared Obama to Bill Clinton and referenced the Oklahoma City bombing or Somalia. That was also a situation where you had a young Democratic president tested early in his presidency, but Clinton, for all his many gifts, didn't inspire the nation the way JFK did or the way Obama is currently doing.

As far as Presidents being tested early in their careers, you've got LBJ coming to power under the most trying of circumstances, Nixon coming in during the Vietnam War and with tons of civil unrest (which was partly his own fault), Carter had an economy in the crapper thanks to the previous three administrations and OPEC flexing on him, et cetera. Every president gets popped with something, and it usually happens early. How they react often determines if they get a second term.

Comment from Asher on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T19:19:29Z

Well, we'll have to disagree. It seems to me that he's saying that foreign powers will be particularly tempted to test Obama because of his age (this in fact was the case with Khrushchev and JFK). I do want to say, though, that I don't agree with Biden on this point, but I do think it was a remarkable gaffe that actually got underplayed. It really just shows you how little chance McCain ever had that nobody cared about this; in an election that was actually up for grabs, this would've been huge.

Comment from lebecka on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T20:32:54Z

Incertus-- your first comment @10:58 speaks directly for me as well. I grew up with a cynical eye on both the government and the baby boomers, and I am only now finding the good, wise parts of each. This could be a function of age and experience in life, but some of it was definitely triggered by the Obama movement.

Comment from The Cat on 2008-11-10

2008-11-10T23:25:51Z

Incertus, the most stringent test an incoming president faced upon assuming office was almost certainly the one that confronted Harry Truman.

In his Pulitzer Prize winning biography of the 33rd president, David McCullough writes of the evening of April 12, 1945, when, having been summoned from House Speaker Rayburn's private office to the White House, Truman met with Eleanor Roosevelt.

Mrs. Roosevelt stepped forward and gently put her arm on Truman's shoulder.
"Harry, the President is dead."
Truman was unable to speak.
"Is there anything I can do for you?" he said at last.
"Is there anything we can do for you," she said. "For you are the one in trouble now."

The next afternoon, speaking to reporters at the Capitol, President Truman said, "Boys, if you ever pray, pray for me now. I don't know if you fellas ever had a load of hay fall on you, but when they told me what happened yesterday, I felt like the moon, the stars, and all the planets had fallen on me."

It wasn't until almost two weeks later, on April 25, 1945, that Truman learned the details of the Manhattan Project and its work to develop the atomic bomb.

Comment from rikyrah on 2008-11-10

2008-11-11T02:21:25Z

This was wonderful, Coates.

Were you the one who commented that Obama was a combo of JFK and Malcolm X? (his sense of calm and his discipline)

Someone did.

Comment from PatricktheRogue on 2008-11-11

2008-11-11T09:59:18Z

I say with certainty that we will heretofore (in say 6 or 12 years) compare others to him. He is a presence all his own, while giving a nod to those who went before.

OK, off subject briefly. I heard the most exquisite mix of "Change gonna come" with bits of Obama's victory speech, Mandela, King, Kennedy (I think), and it was played on NPR in Hawaii a couple days after the election. I can't find it on youtube or anywhere else. There are several versions of clips with some snippets mixed over the song, but this one was very very well done. Anyone? T-N?