<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Ta-Nehisi Coates</title>
      <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:12:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>The journey into white music continues...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Hmm. So I've been playing the French Kicks nonstop this year. I'm a noob Fleetwood Mac fan (feel free to recommend your favorite album) and it's clear that the French Kicks are channeling some of that sound. Anyway, the point is I stumbled across their cover of Trouble this weekend. So I went back and found the original, which was done by some guy named Lindsey Buckingham? Who the fuck is that?? Heh, just joking white folk--though not really. I had to Wikipedia the dude to find out he was part of Fleetwood Mac. Yes, yes, the ignorance is indeed stunning. Anyway, all this is to say I think I like <a href="http://cdn.stereogum.com/mp3/French%20Kicks%20-%20Trouble.mp3">the French Kicks cover</a> better. Maybe the goofy video, which you can see below, turned me off.<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6d1guIZZNbM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6d1guIZZNbM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/the_journey_into_white_music_continues.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/the_journey_into_white_music_continues.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:12:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Not the way to introduce Susan Rice...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/01/cnn-chyron-susan-rice/">Intercontinental Fail</a>.&nbsp; ]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/not_the_way_to_introduce_susan_rice.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/not_the_way_to_introduce_susan_rice.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:01:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>If we all had some Hil, up on Capitol Hill...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I don't have much of a reaction to the story of the day. It'll be great if it works. It'll suck if it doesn't. Profound, no? Still I imagine folks want to talk about this. So here it is my people. Speak your piece.<br /><br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/if_we_all_had_some_hil_up_on_capitol_hill.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/if_we_all_had_some_hil_up_on_capitol_hill.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:41:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Barack Obama CRUSH Puny Malik Shabazz!!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[You're supposed to say that in the Solomon Grundy voice from the old Superfriends...<br /><br />Moving right along, Stanley Crouch thinks the most important thing about Al'Qaeda employing Malcolm X's house slave/field slave analogy, is that shows Obama has crushed Malcolm:<br /><br /><blockquote>
<p>Malcolm X was one of the naysayers to American possibility whose vision was permanently crushed beneath the heel of <strong>Obama</strong>'s
victory on Nov. 4. Though his ideas had nothing to do with the ultimate
form of nonviolence - voting - those desperate to praise him will
pretend now that he was actually a civil rights leader! This has been
going on for an unforgivably long time, especially among black
academics.</p>

<p>Malcolm X had nothing to do with Obama's accomplishment as did none
of the other militants who preached their own version of separatism and
gleefully attacked the civil rights movement as offering no more than
pie in the sky and misleading black people.</p></blockquote><p><i>Unforgivably long!!! Misleading black people!! Other Militants!!! Meddling kids!!!!</i><br /></p><p>It may be true that "other militants" had nothing to do with Obama's win. It is certainly true that people who said Obama wasn't black (<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2006/11/02/2006-11-02_what_obama_isnt_black_like_me_on_race.html">Stanley Crouch</a>) had even less to do with Obama's win. But <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=12&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=crouch_potato_1#111243">as Adam points out</a>, what is literally and demonstrably false is Crouch's claim that Malcom X "had nothing to do with Obama's accomplishment. How do we know this? <i>Because Barack Obama said it in his memoir:</i></p><blockquote><p>In every page of every book, in Bigger Thomas and invisible men, I kept
finding the same anguish, the same doubt; a self-contempt that neither
irony nor intellect seemed able to deflect. Even Du Bois' learning and Baldwin's love and Langston's humor eventually succumbed to its corrosive force, each man finally
forced to doubt art's redemptive power, each man finally forced to
withdraw, one to Africa, one to Europe, one deeper into the bowels of
Harlem, but all of them in the same weary flight, all of them
exhausted, bitter men, the devil at their heels. <i>Only <b>Malcolm X's autobiography </b>seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. <br /></i></p></blockquote><p>If you are writing columns on the president-elect of the greatest power in world history, who happens to be black and you can't even bother to crack his memoir, than you are more than Leeroy Jenkins.  You do not simply fail in epic manner, but more like Palin, Couric and "all of them," like M.C. Hammer hounded by creditors. You are Plaxico at the bar, shooting yourself with your own gun. And in so doing, you ascend to the 37th chamber--the chamber of intergalactic fail. All bow before the master.<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/barack_obama_crush_puny_malik_shabazz.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/barack_obama_crush_puny_malik_shabazz.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:47:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>A bad sign for Bobby Jindal</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Or maybe just <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/29/AR2008112901777.html">political journalists</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>Last weekend, 18 days after <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Barack+Obama?tid=informline" target="">Barack Obama</a>
decisively defeated their candidate for president, a mostly Republican
crowd of self-described conservatives received their first introduction
to someone many prominent members of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Republican+Party?tid=informline" target="">GOP</a> think could be the party's own version of Obama.
<br /></blockquote>You don't say. Obama was the next Kennedy. Then he became the next McGovern. Or was that the next Stevenson? Now he's the next FDR. And Jindal is the next him--because he's, you know, swarthy. The thing about Obama that people, apparently, still don't get is that thus far he has proved himself a damn good politician. He is not simply the eloquent black dude who won--although he's that too. He's the dude who reinvented campaign fundraising, who pioneered the use of social networking, who won Virginia and North Carolina, who ended 50 plus 1. <br /><br />Obama's also the dude who's turned universal healthcare, massive public works projects, and an office of urban policy into the machinations of a centrist or a center-right Democrat.&nbsp; But most importantly Obama opposes dogma. He is a progressive pragmatist trying to tackle issues by creating the broadest coalition possible. Jindal meanwhile..<br /><br /><blockquote>...social conservatives like what they have heard about the public and
private Jindal: his steadfast opposition to abortion without
exceptions; his disapproval of embryonic stem cell research; his and
his wife Supriya's decision in 1997 to enter into a Louisiana covenant
marriage that prohibits no-fault divorce in the state; and his decision
in June to sign into law the Louisiana Science Education Act, a bill
heartily supported by creationists that permits public school teachers
to educate students about both the theory of "scientific design" and
criticisms of Darwinian evolutionary concepts.
<br /></blockquote>So let's see we have, covenant marriages, outlawing abortions--no exceptions--creationism, and banning stem-cell research from the public sector. Sounds pragmatic to me and exactly the sort of&nbsp; issues to build a broad coalition around. Why not resurrect Terri Schiavo while we're at it. This dude isn't Barack Obama. He's George W. Bush--he's a more competent George Bush. <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/a_bad_sign_for_bobby_jindal.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/12/a_bad_sign_for_bobby_jindal.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The definitive rebuttal to this stupid, stupid, stupid discussion</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Props to <a href="http://55secretstreet.typepad.com/anovelista/">Nichelle</a> for digging this up. I really, really hate this debate. It makes my skin crawl. But here is Obama talking about identity:<br /><br /><blockquote>
 He decided he belonged to the "community of humanity." I asked him whether that smacked of <a class="taxInlineTagLink" href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/sports/golf/tiger-woods-PESPT008527.topic" title="Tiger Woods" id="PESPT008527">Tiger Woods</a>' description of his biracial identity, which some blacks saw as a rejection of the black community.<br /><br /> "My view has always been that I'm African-American," he said.
"African Americans by definition, we're a hybrid people. One of things
I loved about my mother was not only did she not feel rejected by me
defining myself as an African-American, but she recognized that I was a
black man in the United States and my experiences were going to be
different than hers."<br /><br /> At the same time, Obama says, when he takes his daughters to
Hawaii to visit his grandmother--his mother is deceased--they visit a
little old white lady from Kansas.<br /><br />
 They also spend time with his pregnant half-sister, who's part Indonesian and married to a Chinese Canadian.<br /><br /> "My daughters will grow up with a cousin who looks entirely Asian
but who carries my blood in him. It's pretty hard not to claim that
larger community."<br /></blockquote>



Again, I don't agree with the Tiger Woods thing--though, at one point, I really did. We're all maturing here. A big part of that is to privilege actual people, instead of the essentialists on both sides, in the debate over their identity.<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_definitive_rebuttal_to_this_stupid_stupid_stupid_discussion.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_definitive_rebuttal_to_this_stupid_stupid_stupid_discussion.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:59:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The question of Cablinasians</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Commenter AMT writes:<br /><br /><blockquote>I haven't seen a thread here on interracial marriage/dating. I'm interested to hear your thoughts on the subject. <br /></blockquote><br />OK, let's go. I've never dated interracially. When I was younger, and much less mature, I said I'd never do it. No that doesn't quite go far enough, I claimed that black men, specifically, should <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=13907">stick with their own</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>I know a couple of black men who are honestly in love with white women.
They've dated black women before, but this is who they fell for. But
those who manage to shake off the cultural conditioning are rare
indeed. I stick with black women, not because of any aversion to white
women, not because of any "Nubian princess" mythology, and not because
I think crossing the line would necessarily conflict with my politics.
I stick with black women because I wonder, in this climate, if an
honest relationship with anybody else is possible. I stick with black
women because I know how men (black and white) routinely use them for
toilet stools. I stick with black women because I know to do anything
else, whether I meant to or not, would be to become an accomplice to
that crime.<br /></blockquote>Oh man. So young. So ideologically pure. What happened to me? I wrote that right after I turned 22. I had just become a professional writer. And I was pretty stupid. Not stupid like, ill-read, but in those days, I didn't understand the limits of ideology--namely that it can say so much about the world, and yet so little about your life, or your neighbor's life, or the girl on the train's life.<br /><br />I am ten-years deep into my relationship, and here is what I know--a long term relationship will make pragmatists of us all. It is hard to find someone you even enjoy sleeping with, much less live with. But please indulge me in that former point for a moment, while I&nbsp; deliver a message to the youth who are of age: When you're talking about long-term, you better enjoy it. Not cold pizza enjoy it. Not Big Mac enjoy it.&nbsp; But hot apple pie with ice cream--after you just smoked a blunt--enjoy it. What's that TV On The Radio joint? <br /><br /><blockquote><div align="left">Oh but the longing is terrible<br />Gentle heart under attack<br />I wanna love you all the way off<br />I wanna break your back.<br /></div></blockquote>Fuck what you've heard. Until those lyrics mean something to you, keep looking. Sorry, back to our programming... <br /><br />Look it's hard enough to satisfy the basic carnal needs--it's even harder to satisfy those needs, and satisfy the basic emotional and mental ones too. There is a good chance that your long-term relationship will one day fail. A great way to up the chances of truly epic fail, hot grits, I'm talking hot grits fail, burn down the mansion fail, is to shrink the pool of your potential partners.<br /><b>[MORE]</b> <br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_difficult_mindbending_and_complicted_case_of_interracial_dating.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_difficult_mindbending_and_complicted_case_of_interracial_dating.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:49:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Barack Obama isn&apos;t black</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Maria Arana wishes to alert you <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/28/AR2008112802219.html?hpid=opinionsbox1&amp;sub=AR&amp;sid=ST2008112900984&amp;s_pos=">to this fact</a>. Before we proceed, let us note that one of the unfortunate things about this campaign is that a slur that is universally condemned when used by poor black kid, is now acceptable for everyone else. Where are all the anti-nationalists, now? Where are all the ones who told us that the biggest threat to black America, was our penchant for telling people they weren't black? What? Nothing? Meh, I should have known. Moving right along, here's Arana:<br /><br /><blockquote>
To me, as to increasing numbers of mixed-race people, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Barack+Obama?tid=informline" target="">Barack Obama</a>
is not our first black president. He is our first biracial, bicultural
president. He is more than the personification of African American
achievement. He is a bridge between races, a living symbol of
tolerance, a signal that strict racial categories must go.
<br /></blockquote>The logic here being that there are no black people who are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Kodjoe">biracial</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Jarrett">bicultural</a>. Whenever I read these jingoistic biracial arguments I wonder whether they're little more than attempts to take credit. Somehow, if, say, the&nbsp; Beltway sniper's mother was white, I don't think there'd be a throng of non-black people yelling, "But he's not really black!!" <br /><br />I wish to highlight the authors parentage as "the child of a white Kansan mother and a foreign father." I mean no disrespect to her or her roots. I simply suspect this sort of thinking is most common among people who aren't likely to have been erroneously stopped by cops, endured fried chicken jokes, done the whop, been embarrassed by group of black kids acting a fool on the train, or snapped on someone's played-out Chuck Purcells--among other things. But you can judge that <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/10/latin-american-aerials/arana-field-notes">for yourself</a>.<br /><br />Look, the thing is this--or rather, the things are this. To be black is not simply to be the opposite of white. Black is a racial/ethnic/cultural/historical marker. Sometimes it's better to think of black people like you think of the Irish. Sometimes it's better to think of us like you think of the Jews. And still other times it's better to think of us as Southern. But mostly it's best to think of us as, you know. humans.<br /><br />
But nationalism--be it monoracial, biracial, or multiracial--has no respect for actual individual humans. And nationalism is really Arana's point--she simply seeks to substitute the strictures of one group (a charmed, rainbow of genes and cultures) and for another (a presumably, pure strain from straight out the Congo). But asserting that Obama isn't black but biracial, is really no better than asserting that he's black, but not biracial. <br /><br />The arrogance of both arguments are quite stunning.&nbsp; As an African-American, I'd think myself far, far out of place to tell a dude whose mother was a Russian Jew, and father was a Muslim Arab, that he had no right to call himself a Jew or a Muslim or an Arab or even a Russiuan. What the fuck do I know about his life?<br /><br />Everything flows from respect. Tiger Woods calls himself multiracial. The moral thing to do is not to launch into all sorts of diatribes about shame and blackness, but accept him as he accepts himself. But that cuts both ways. Barack Obama calls himself a biracial black man. The human thing to do, is nod your head and say "Got it." The human thing is to respect these dudes. Respect our own ignorance of their lives. And most of all, respect their humanity. <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/barack_obama_isnt_black.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/barack_obama_isnt_black.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:11:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Chris Matthews for Senate</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>UPDATE:</b> Sorry guys, in semi-vacation mode here. Anyway, as you've surely already seen Chris Matthews <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/28/chris-matthews-senate-run_n_146949.html">says he's not</a> in prep mode.<br /><br />Uhhh...this strikes me as <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/chris-matthews-running-for-pennsylvania.html">a bad idea</a>. Just based on his show, if I were in Pennsy, I might vote for Arlen Specter. I'm not one for gotcha journalism, but this is an attack ad in waiting. I guess this sort of thing isn't policy, so it shouldn't matter, but still...<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jpxkKeNgbyU&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jpxkKeNgbyU&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/chris_matthews_for_senate.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/chris_matthews_for_senate.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:06:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Great Ronnie Lott On Charlie Rose</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Props to Wallyz for the tip. Fast forward som for Lott.<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/f6yAywbwaOI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f6yAywbwaOI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_great_ronnie_lott_on_charlie_rose.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_great_ronnie_lott_on_charlie_rose.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:44:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Billy Dee Williams says, &quot;Where do I go to get my image back?&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Just when you thought Obama had made it safe for the public image of Negroes, Bob Johnson claps back:<br /><br /><blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="Apple-style-span">Robert L. Johnson</span>,
the founder of Black Entertainment Television, has asked the Federal
Communications Commission&nbsp;to approve plans for a new "urban" television
network that would cater to a multicultural audience interested in
health, lifestyle, education and other issues, a spokeswoman for
Johnson told Journal-isms on Tuesday.<br /></blockquote>An ill wind just blew over Harlem. An ill, ill wind.<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/billy_dee_williams_says_where_do_i_go_to_get_my_image_back.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/billy_dee_williams_says_where_do_i_go_to_get_my_image_back.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>They are who we thought they were...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Man, <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/11/lieberman_contributed_to_gop_s.html">oh man</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>Here's a story of the Thanksgiving spirit, forgiving and forgetting senatorial style.<br /><br />
When Democrats gathered last week to decide the fate of Sen. Joe
Lieberman (I-Conn.), a pair of senators-elect, Tom Udall of New Mexico
and Jeff Merkley of Oregon, stepped up to offer symbolically important
speeches.<br /><br />
Having ridden the wave of support for President-elect Barack Obama,
Udall and Merkley spoke out in favor of the spirit of reconciliation
and moving on from the campaign, in which Lieberman was one of the
highest profile supporters of the Republican presidential ticket.<br /><br />
But no one in the room knew, as Merkley spoke, that Lieberman had
supported Merkley's opponent, Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.). Lieberman,
through his Reuniting Our Country PAC, <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/11/lieberman_contributed_to_gop_s.html">gave Smith's reelection bid $5,000 on Oct. 10</a>, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.<br /></blockquote>
 
 
 Lieberman never fails to dissappoint, no? Look, I'm still "meh" on the idea of Obama taking Lieberman out. But Connecticut needs to do this cat when time comes. That's just dirty.<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/they_are_who_we_thought_they_were.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/they_are_who_we_thought_they_were.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:00:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open NFL Thread</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Since we've been turning every other thread into a football thread, let's go there. We can talk about whatever but let's start with this query from CitizenE:<br /><br /><blockquote>Now I ask you--maybe they're a bit too clean, but Steve Young and Jerry Rice or Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin? <br /></blockquote>Look, don't ever let anyone tell you that a quaterback who wins three Super Bowls in four years, who goes to four straight championship games and wins three of them--one under Barry Switzer, no less--is overrated. Aikman was a great, great quarterback--the anti-Favre. Like Favre, he was a winner, but he didn't do the spectacular shit that Favre did. Of course he also didn't do the stupid shit either. He was just incredibly accurate. Irvin is the most physical receiver I've ever seen play the game. He also is one of the most competitive and hardest working athletes I've seen. He played reciever the way people play basketball--he'd catch passes with no separation at all, essentially boxing cornerbacks out. It was fucking incredible.<br /><br />But let's be real here--Steve Young was basically the perfect quarterback. He could run like Mike Vick (almost) and throw like Peyton Manning. Jerry Rice is the greatest receiver to ever play the game. There simply is no comparison. I'm a lifetime Cowboys fan--but it's a weak-ass fan who goes all jingoist in spite of the actual facts. This following clip isn't a Rice to Young hookup, but it's what I'll always remember about Young. It is, to my mind, one of the greatest plays ever--look at T.O just laying there, crying like a baby. Listen to Summerall and Madden. This is why I love football. In another time, with a team that invested in him, Young would have been the greatest ever.<br /><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m3C4P9O20Qk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m3C4P9O20Qk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/open_nfl_thread_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/open_nfl_thread_1.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:51:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The very sharp Chris Hayes</title>
         <description><![CDATA[On Gates, Obama and Brennan. Good stuff.<br /><br /><iframe src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/27916709#27916709" scrolling="no" width="425" frameborder="0" height="339"></iframe>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_very_sharp_chris_hayes.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_very_sharp_chris_hayes.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Presidents to represent me</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Frequent commenter Rikyrah has an <a href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/11/barack-obama-the-first-celebrity-president/">interesting piece</a> up about Obama, not as our first black president, but as our first celebrity president. Of course there was Camelot before him, but there was no US Weekly, People or TMZ--at least not as they exist today. The point is that Obama is the first president that the celeb machine is actually obsessing over:<br /><br /><blockquote><p>Barack Obama is the first CELEBRITY President. I don't mean that in
a bad way. I just mean it in a factual way. He's the first President of
the Modern Celebrity Culture that we live in today. </p><p>To be honest, that realization frightened me. I mean, look at the
magazine racks. Obama isn't just on magazines like Time and Newsweek,
the Obamas, or some combination of them are on People, US, Life &amp;
Style, OK, The Star. </p><p>Look at that list. </p><p>Within days of the election, what did we hear about the WeeMichelles? Some offer from Hanna Montana? </p><p>Then there was the article in the Wall Street Journal about Malia,
her dress from Election Night, how it sold out, and maybe she's going
to be a trendsetter for the ' tween' set. </p><p>I turn on the tv and see Inside Edition doing a piece on Sasha's Dress - yes, SASHA, and how it's become a sellout too. <br /></p></blockquote>




<p>Meh, I knew it was over when I saw the tabs trading rumors about the First Couple's various affairs. It's pretty crazy.<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/presidents_to_represent_me_2.php</link>
         <guid>http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/presidents_to_represent_me_2.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
 